Women Seeking Women Vol. 194 - On Sale! Super Savings Weekend Sale

Preview Preview
On Sale!

Premium PPM 2:1

Purchase PPM Minutes to start watching.

Buy Minutes

2 Day Rental :

Original Price :

Sale : Save

HD up to 2160p

Stream for Life :

Original Price :

Sale : Save

HD up to 2160p

Download :

Original Price :

Sale : Save

HD up to 2160p


Cast & Stars of Women Seeking Women Vol. 194

Browse Similar

Customer Reviews

2 great scenes, 2 awful scenes

By DeepKissLoverxxx
We have 2 great scenes here. One with Riley Nixon (finally back) and Ashlyn Peaks. The other with Ember Snow and Krystal Spark. These two scenes had some really hot kissing. The other 2 scenes are garbage.

On the right track

By Grass
A lot of annoying fake sounds. Gave it 4 stars because GF flims just doesn't do enough breast play. Refreshing to see it featured in 2 scenes. It enhances the build up IMO

Annoying Porn Noises

By Lezzyist
There are not many moments of good pussy-eating action in this, and when there were, porn antics ruined them. Ashlyn going down on Riley looked hot, but the cunnilingus stopped every two seconds for some reason instead of Ashlyn staying with it, usually just so Ashlyn could pull away from Riley's pussy and make exaggerated humming sound effects...Unnecessary, annoying, and distracting smh. And it happened every time it looked like Riley was really about to get into it. That is so irritating. Krystal riding Ember's face looked hot, but again, the best bits of that ruined by Ember giving us boring vocal pornyness instead of just letting us see her intensity. The first scene had Jessica doing this pretend-to-be-breathing-heavily thing early on in the sex that was extremely repetitive and annoying so I skipped ahead to the scene after. I guess she was trying to help the time pass or something, I don't know but it wasn't sexy. Performers can't just play with each other as themselves without the vocal antics these days? Sarah Taylor and Chloe Amour's cunnilingus efforts didn't look good at all, save for a literal two seconds where I thought Sarah was going to really give good tongue strokes but she switched to some goofy position where she is kinda aligned as if she was in 69. The lack of good intense consistent action is something I expected and why I opted not to put any money on this one. Maybe the next one will have a focus on getting the performers off, including real effort and action, and little to zero annoying porn mouth sound effects. I also really dislike cheesy plotline dialogue during the sex, like "don't you want this to last forever?" or whatever Sarah said to Chloe. Probably going to cancel my Gamma/GFF site membership because you guys just aren't giving us real, nasty, and sexy. GFF used to have people like Jessie Andrews and Elle Alexandra actively trying to give the other performer an orgasm. This stuff yall are putting out today is too into being cheesy and produced (ugh the awful music playing into the sex), position checklist-oriented, and performative. Get back to things looking good and raw and hypersexual.

I did notice that there was lots of bed action in this. That was nice to see. But overall too much acting and theatrics, too little intensity and actual hot body language reactions. Performers making fake porn noises really screw up a sex video and they are the biggest reason I have stopped renting/buying sight-unseen, as I said I would. This release proves that was the smart thing to do. Maybe the next release will be good. I want to support the industry. Likely, it will just be the same. The cheesiness does not deserve money. I want to see raw sex and people feeling really good during it. Otherwise, I will not come back and I'll just stick to Pornhub.

So, So

By Capt1
Ashlynn needs to stop leaving clothes on.